Saturday 1 February 2014

An analysis of the book, The Greens: Policies, reality and consequences


Introduction
With strategies to address climate change that are more reflective of the science than the two major parties, I became interested in exploring the range of policies of the Australian Greens (Greens).  Coalition and Labor politicians, Facebook friends, crazed Christians, Murdoch publications and semi-sensible journalists are some of the many groups that sensationally blabber that the Greens’ policies are extreme, irrational, and unaffordable.  Finding limited information that critically examines the Greens, a research paper by Dr Joy McCann from the Australian Department of Parliamentary Services directed me to a 2011 book, edited by Andrew McIntyre, The Greens: Policies, reality and consequences.  McCann, a respected Australian social and environmental historian, credits this as one of the first books to critically examine the Greens.  She states, “the expert contributors to [t]his book roundly condemned the Greens’ policy agenda, variously describing aspects of it as economically irresponsible, naive, internally contradictory and morally and socially unsound”[1]. 

What McCann did not indicate is that the 22 authors consist exclusively of conservative politicians, political advisors, commentators, academics, and right-wing think-tank representatives; all of whom prescribe to hyper-economic rationalism and/or Christian moralism.  This analysis will summarise each chapter of the book, exploring the larger body of work of the authors, to deconstruct their moral-, economic-, political- or other- agenda. The authors examine a range of Greens’ policies including Education; Health; Multiculturalism; Economics; and Immigration. I will engage with experts to argue that the book does not address the needs of all Australians, instead supporting policy for the economically privileged, and the morally and socially conservative.  Further, I will question the perceived left-wing bias of the Greens, arguing that progressive policy needs to do more to provide a full-blown critique of capitalism and economic rationalism.

No comments:

Post a Comment