This is a review of Aniello Iannuzzi's chapter in the book, The Greens:
Policies, reality and consequences.
For an introduction to the review, see my other blog post at:
http://campbell197626.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/an-analysis-of-book-greens-policies.html
http://campbell197626.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/an-analysis-of-book-greens-policies.html
Aniello Iannuzzi on the Australian Greens’
Health policies
“So
whilst old ladies lie in public hospital beds with hip fractures awaiting
surgery, the Greens will be spending money on whales and other creatures, and
at the same time promoting euthanasia to be freely available on demand with
negligible safeguards. What is in effect legalised assisted suicide and murder
will further push doctors into major ethical dilemmas. The economically
draining elderly and disabled will be liquidated in order to free up funds for
saving animals, abortions and allowing assisted reproduction for those deemed
suitable”[1].
This
extract from a
revised, extended version of Dr Aniello Iannuzzi's chapter on the Australian Greens’ (Greens) health policy from the book, The
Greens: Policies, reality and
consequences, showcases Iannuzzi’s sensationalist, paranoid, Christian
morality.
Iannuzzi, a rural NSW GP, asserts that the Greens’ policies focus
on ensuring the rights of animals, at the expense of human beings[2]. What Iannuzzi fails to note is that,
since the early 1970s, philosophy has become involved in the question of animal
liberation, defining the views of the likes of Iannuzzi as mere unenlightened
speciesism. In his book, In defence of
animals: The second wave, Peter Singer points out that, “the
Judeo-Christian ethic teaches that the lives of human beings are sacred and the
lives of other beings are not”. (p.6) Like many conservatives, Iannuzzi is obsessed with the supposed
irrational and misanthropic nature of the Greens His paranoia over their supposed extreme- environmentalism, -socialism, and - animal rights policies and is a fury of stupidity. Iannuzzi’s traditional stance against
voluntary euthanasia, abortion and assisted reproduction for non-heterosexual
couples is informed by a conservative Christian morality and clouds his ability to rationally analysis.
For Iannuzzi, focus on substantial matters pertaining to the healthcare system are rare. In a discussion of Denticare, Iannuzzi asserts
that the Greens’ policies are un-costed and unaffordable. While the Greens’ Denticare policy intends to bring dental health
fully in to Medicare,[3]
Iannuzzi argues that dentists do not want to be forced to work under a system
that would reduce their earning capacity. Nevertheless, after the publication of this book, the Greens
helped secure part of a new national dental health scheme, which has
contributed to providing free dental care to children.[4]
Moreover, the
Greens’ Denticare plan has now been fully costed by the Parliamentary Budget
office.[5]
Iannuzzi demonstrates a revolting
intersection of Christian morality with a commitment to individualism and
economic rationalism. He infers
that these philosophies naturally form the basis of human behaviour. While much Modern Western thinking has become informed by individualism, economic rationalism and Christianity, it is important to remember that the value placed on these philosophies is historically and social constructed. In Pushing our luck: Ideas for Australian Progress, feminist Eva Cox recognises that people are not motivated purely by individualism and economic rationalism. Her contribution is a call for governments and individuals to recognise the failures of neoliberal thinking.
My trust in Iannuzzi’s voice as an
expert on health policy plummeted further when his wider agenda became apparent in the following quote, the “carbon tax, mining tax and gagging of free speech
have been achieved. Gay marriage, euthanasia, and repression of independent
school curricula seem only moments away".[6]
Drifting far
from the topic of health, Iannuzzi appears to be more invested in asserting a
particular moral, (economic, individualist) agenda, rather than addressing how successfully Greens' policies provide for the healthcare of all Australians. Iannuzzi's chapter on Greens' health policies suggests that he focuses on the needs of those privileged by systems of Christianity and Capitalism.
[1]
http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2012/4/vile-medicine
[2] what it means to be human and the value of human beings over other
animals…reinforcing the idea that the Greens are anti-human…the chapter is
called ‘A Nanny State will keep you healthy…if you are an animal’
[3] Denticare
would give all Australians access to dental care under Medicare, and would
phase in over 5 years, starting with the most needy. Under Denticare, going to the
dentist would be just like going to the doctor. (from the policy)
[4] free dental treatment for children. In
2012, the Greens negotiated a new national dental health scheme worth nearly $5
billion over the next 6 years, bringing Medicare-funded dentistry to 3.4
million children. The
Greens also secured $1.3 billion for extra public services and hundreds of
millions more for new dental infrastructure. This is the biggest boost to
dental health Australia has seen. http://greensmps.org.au/content/media-releases/better-dental-care-millions-australians
[5] http://greens.org.au/denticare with a cost of $4.87 billion over
the forward estimates. The Parliamentary
Budget Office estimates the Denticare scheme when fully implemented will cost
$8.5 billion in
2018-19
Individualism has many positive characteristics however its problems come from the fact the the individual to do not come equal positions. Whether is be financially or through relationships the position of advantage that some within the community have enables them to use the individualism philosophy to their benefit over others. The only answer is social policy to somehow level the playing field. Whats interesting about Iannuzzi as a Christian is his lack of understanding for those who can't access dental care or his appreciation for gods creation the whales whom form part of out ecosystem ... in fact there seems no clear line of thought from this man at all.
ReplyDelete